Sometimes You Can Be Too Conservative!

Greetings,

There is a group of people at the web site called 'Conservapedia' that decided the Bible is too liberal.

Huh?

I like what Beliefnet columnist Rod Dreher said,

"You really need to read the whole Conservapedia entry to grasp how crazy this is. It's like what you'd get if you crossed the Jesus Seminar with the College Republican chapter at a rural institution of Bible learnin'."

These conservatives so-called should take heed to Moses:

Deuteronomy 4:2 Ye shall not add to the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish aught from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.

God Bless,

Jim

Revelations Commentary Reading Update

Revelation, fol. CXCVIIIr: The angel with the key to the
bottomless pit, binding the dragon for a thousand years

Blessings to you gentle readers,

As some of you know, I have been reading several Revelations commentaries, mostly by Lutheran commentators but one was a patristic commentary with commentary and sermons culled from the early Christian Fathers. I recently finished these volumes:

• The Revelation To John: A Commentary by Martin H. Franzmann

• Revelation: New Testament Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture edited by William C. Weinrich

• The interpretation of St. John's Revelation by R. C. H. Lenski

I'm just starting a Revelation commentary by Rev. Louis Brighton - which is a magnum opus in my opinion (and I've just finished the intro!) weighing in at 673 pages and 10 x 7.5 x 2 inches in size its a whopper! No matter where you go it seems to run for about $42.99 new and not much less used. I would say it is suitable for the studious layman, pastor, theology student, etc. I would recommend Franzmann and Mueller as more suitable volumes for the entry level. I personally feel Mueller's Revelation commentary is better, it's more thorough without being technical or jargonish. Franzmann's Revelation commentary is no where near as good as his classic treatment of Romans.

I have also downloaded a Revelations Bible Study by Rev. Paul Bartz from the Confessional Lutherans website. I have yet to read it though. When I do, I'll comment on it.

I have also learned of a Revelations Commentary that is over 800 pages for only $10:

Revelation - Scripture’s Crescendo and Culmination, (839 pages), by Laurence White - $10.00

I have yet to read that one either, but it sounds intriguing.

TTFN,

Jim

Religious Liberty Update

Greetings,

As I understand this bill from my sources, mere participation in the aforementioned 'volunteer' program would then prohibit a young person from participating in a lot of other outside programs including Church.

I must apologize, I am way behind the curve on this one. The bill became law just today, it is called the 'Serve America Act' now, previously called Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education. It is an expansion of the Americorps ( www.americorps.gov ) program where college money from the government is exchanged for government service. The person who alerted me to all this was a bit johnny-come-lately on this and so I am too. The Senate version (S 277) already passed and today Obama signed it into law. Section 132A of the new law forbids funds going to any entity that is:

Engaging in religious instruction, conducting worship services, providing instruction as part of a program that includes mandatory religious instruction or worship, constructing or operating facilities devoted to religious instruction or worship, maintaining facilities primarily or inherently devoted to religious instruction or worship, or engaging in any form of proselytization, consistent with section 132.

So the above paragraph is already law and I bet many or all of us did not know until today.

A companion bill (not yet passed into law) HR 1444 would make this 'volunteer' service mandatory. So the bill is law and we are too late to stop that but we can attempt to stop HR 1444 and whatever it's Senate version maybe:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1444

Remember, when government expands, liberty contracts.

Jim

Church Attendance, Confirmation, Sunday School - Against The Law

Greetings,

I couldn't believe this until I checked it out for myself. I found the bill on Govtrack, the House passed it, the Senate has yet to vote.

HR 1388: Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act (AKA The Obama Youth Brigade Bill)

Click on this link:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-1388

then scroll down to sec 1310 in the yelow and click on it, it reads,

‘SEC. 132A. PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES AND INELIGIBLE ORGANIZATIONS.

‘(a) Prohibited Activities- An approved national service position under this subtitle may not be used for the following activities:

‘(1) Attempting to influence legislation.

‘(2) Organizing or engaging in protests, petitions, boycotts, or strikes.

‘(3) Assisting, promoting, or deterring union organizing.

‘(4) Impairing existing contracts for services or collective bargaining agreements.

‘(5) Engaging in partisan political activities, or other activities designed to influence the outcome of an election to Federal office or the outcome of an election to a State or local public office.

‘(6) Participating in, or endorsing, events or activities that are likely to include advocacy for or against political parties, political platforms, political candidates, proposed legislation, or elected officials.

‘(7) Engaging in religious instruction, conducting worship services, providing instruction as part of a program that includes mandatory religious instruction or worship, constructing or operating facilities devoted to religious instruction or worship, maintaining facilities primarily or inherently devoted to religious instruction or worship, or engaging in any form of proselytization, consistent with section 132.

‘(8) Consistent with section 132, providing a direct benefit to any--

‘(A) business organized for profit;

‘(B) labor union;

‘(C) partisan political organization;

‘(D) nonprofit organization that fails to comply with the restrictions contained in section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, except that nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prevent participants from engaging in advocacy activities undertaken at their own initiative; and

‘(E) organization engaged in the religious activities described in paragraph (7), unless the position is not used to support those religious activities.

‘(9) Providing abortion services or referrals for receipt of such services.

‘(10) Conducting a voter registration drive or using Corporation funds to conduct a voter registration drive.

‘(11) Carrying out such other activities as the Corporation may prohibit.

‘(b) Ineligibility- No assistance provided under this subtitle may be provided to any organization that has violated a Federal criminal statute.

‘(c) Nondisplacement of Employed Workers or Other Volunteers- A participant in an approved national service position under this subtitle may not be directed to perform any services or duties, or to engage in any activities, prohibited under the nonduplication, nondisplacement, or nonsupplantation requirements relating to employees and volunteers in section 177.’.

------------

Time to burn up the phone lines and PASS THIS ON to everyone you can think of!

Herb Kohl
http://kohl.senate.gov/contact.cfm
Russ Feingold
http://feingold.senate.gov/contact_opinion.html

Outside of Wisconsin:
http://senate.gov/

You can search for your Senator by state in the upper right hand corner of the page.

In Christ,

Jim

What Church Father Are You?

You’re St. Melito of Sardis! You have a great love of history and liturgy. You’re attached to the traditions of the ancients, yet you recognize that the old world — great as it was — is passing away. You are loyal to the customs of your family, though you do not hesitate to call family members to account for their sins. Find out which Church Father you are at The Way of the Fathers!

Reading Luther's Sermons

Greetings,

I'm still slogging through 3 Revelation commentaries (I'm up to chap 19!) but since Lent began I have also been reading Luther's Sermons again. I have an eight volume set I bought back in 1988 that read all the way through once over a summer (I had a sedentary job as a security guard) and I began to read these in earnest again. I most recently read Luther's sermon for Easter on the Sacrament of Holy Communion. If Luther's Sermon is any measure of good practice - then I feel none of the Synods are following it.

Back in the day, people were compelled to make a confession to a priest and then take communion on Easter. Luther was opposed to the practice because these people were going right back to the sinful lives they led beforehand often with no effort to better themselves. Also Luther distinguishes between 'historical faith' - head knowledge that Christ had indeed existed -vs- 'real faith' of the heart as well. Today some fellow Lutherans (who can be 'Left Brain' to a fault) would yell PIETISM! But here they have to argue with Luther himself so I think that claim falls flat. I think Luther was worried about people living in open sin, habitually drunk, etc. Also Luther wanted people to have a faith that was bicameral - more in keeping with the Scriptures:

Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. - Matthew 22:37, Mark 12:30 & Luke 10:27.

Luther was also on guard against the 'herd mentality' which was to have everyone take communion. He wanted people to be asked one-by-one if they wanted it and not to rely on the faith or piety of family members but an individual desire to receive it. I have not been asked that for years. Congregations I was a member of who were conscientious usually collected communion cards at the altar and elders were required to know who everyone was. Also even long time members were supposed to register for communion in a register prior to worship and that was as good as it ever got.

So the WELS and ELS churches I once attended were holding fast to the Galesburg Rule but not Luther's. Luther wanted to be sure the communicant actually desired forgiveness from Christ and was not just 'going up' as a matter of law, custom or peer pressure. I'm not going to go into my current LCMS congregation for now because I am not fully informed on it's practice but I will say they have no statement regarding participation in their bulletins.

The bottom line is we live in such a materialistic society these days that few approach the sacrament with the same fear, wonder and awe that Luther had in his day. Some might say that was because Luther was a victim of medieval theology and magical thinking and to a degree that is true but yet - as Christians who confess the Creeds, do we not believe in all things both seen and unseen? I think our lips move and our hearts lie. If we did believe as we should, we would have no open communion and we would see people get turned away from the altar once in a while. I haven't seen anyone turned back from any synodical altar since the early 1990s.

Another thing that really takes me back is Luther's language. Luther had a lawyers gift for rhetorical flourish. Today he would be so politically incorrect and offensive he would require his own team of ACLU attorneys to keep him out of jail just for being himself. Luther would have a hard time with today's idolatrous worship of pluralism, tolerance and diversity. Luther was a warrior for truth and let the chips fall where they may. Since I read him in English translation, I wonder just how bowdlerized the English speaking pastors who translated these sermons rendered some of what he said. As Nicolas Cage's character Ben Gates said in National Treasure, "People don't talk that way anymore."

They certainly don't and that is most certainly true.

In Christ,

Jim

Which Way LCMS?

Greetings,

The LCMS seems to be heading in several differing directions right now:

1) Some would like it to go 'evangelical' and adopt the worship & theology of other non-denominational (i.e. Reformed), conversion-orientated churches. Some of this group would also welcome a more ecumenical practice of fellowship and some would be open to women's ordination (some would not) and other changes in doctrine.

2) Some want to go back to a more confessional direction like that had in the days of the old Synodical Conference with more emphasis given to traditional forms of worship, theology from the Book of Concord and the great theologians of Lutheranism and doing everything with a more distinctly Lutheran polity.

3) Then there is a portion of the LCMS leadership and bureaucracy which wants 'peace at any price' between those 2 major factions.

This is painting with a broad brush, there are self-described feminists, evangelicals, pentecostals, fundamentalists, conservatives, confessionalists and a some east-coast liberals who are ELCA-wannabees in the English District.

These problems go back 70 years to the theological battles of the 1940s. Doctrinal standards were on a slow, barely perceptible decline in the LCMS under President Behnken. In the 1940s and '50s there were debates over the practice of the doctrine of fellowship within the Synodical Conference - then made up of the ELS (Evangelical Lutheran Synod), the LCMS (Lutheran Church Missouri Synod) and the WELS (Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod).

In 1955, the little ELS severed ties with the LCMS. Some WELS congregations felt the same way and broke from the WELS and formed the CLC (Church of the Lutheran Confession) and several years later the WELS followed suit. This was because the LCMS was having exploratory talks with the ALC (American Lutheran Church) which had different doctrines regarding lodges and predestination from the LCMS. For the LCMS to consider fellowship with the ALC meant to the ELS and WELS that the LCMS had a different doctrine of fellowship than that practiced by the ELS and WELS. By 1963 the Synodical Conference had disbanded. This helped give rise to the LCMS' Presidency of Oliver Harms. Little changed and the slide continued.

Cooperation existed between the ALC and LCMS until 1970 when the ALC started ordaining women. Several years later under President J.A.O. Preus II, the LCMS had the battle for the Bible. Preus (who had family in the ELS) tried to reverse many of the liberal trends taking place in the LCMS. One of them culminated in the 'Seminex' (Concordia Seminary In Exile) fiasco where John Tietjen had been the President of the seminary at St. Louis was fired for not teaching the Bible as the inerrent Word of God. He had introduced radical forms of higher-critical scholarship into the student body. In 1973 Tietjen was brought up on charges of heresy and teaching false doctrine. The charges were verified by the members of the systematic theology department. Some students and faculty walked out and formed Seminex which became the locus for a new liberal synod, the AELC. That synod would later merge with the moderate ALC and liberal LCA to form the now ELCA in 1987.

Going back a bit, after the controversial years of Preus' leadership, the LCMS sought a peacemaker and they found one in the person of Ralph Bohlman from 1981 to 1992. The LCMS was ready for less drama and Bohlman talked like a conservative and governed like a moderate. The liberal factions that did not leave and join the AELC for whatever reason remained and quietly grew under his leadership of the Synod.

Skip ahead to late 2001 after 9/11. Kieschnick was the newly minted President of the LCMS and his Atlantic District President David Benke participated in a ecumenical, unionistic memorial ceremony remembering the 9/11 victims. This was a 'damned if you do damned if you don't' situation. While the LCMS had stumbled in decades past over the fellowship issue, it had finally seemed to have hit it's stride in the Bohlman years. It sold itself as a theologically center-right church body. Not part of the liberal mainline denominations but still aloof from church bodies it called legalistic (ELS, WELS, etc). It was conservative enough to be called 'conservative' but with still enough wiggle room to not be embarrassed by it in front of it's non-Lutheran neighbors.

The nation was facing a national tragedy and that seemed more compelling than what the Bible says about Christianity being the narrow way to eternal life and Benke took part in the ceremony because he was more worried about appearances in front of the world than answering to Christ. Being a public figure, he was spotted and called out on it by Lutherans all across the country who thought it was a pagan or at least unionistic memorial ceremony. This became particularly tough on Kieschnick who was from Texas and was an acquaintance of President George W. Bush. It became a question of what seemed to be patriotism -vs- narrow sectarian doctrinal legalism in the eyes of the world.

Members of the ELS and WELS who would not say the pledge at ball games nor have military chaplains suddenly felt vindicated after all these years. They had remained faithful in what seemed to be a small thing. They had been ridiculed by the world for it and now they felt vindicated but more importanly their confessional kindred in the LCMS had spoken out in agreement. Without going into the minutiae of events since, I feel it is safe to say that Bohlmann's centrist 'peace at any price' patch is now shown to be worn threadbare.

This has been further exacerbated by the removal of the program Issues, Etc. from KFUO radion and the current legal actions President Kieschnick is using to try to silence (or censor if you prefer) Todd Wilken and Jeff Schwarz who have been critical of his Presidency. Even some conservative and moderate clergy feel President Kieschnick has been heavy handed and some are wont for a change.

The current perceived agent of change is Rev. Matthew Harrison. He has translated some important confessional writings, wrote some thoughtful articles and has practicle experience in world missions, particularly with releif efforts. He has released a paper called "It's Time:LCMS UNITY AND MISSION -The Real Problem We Face and How to Solve It" which many see as a call to unity and truth.

Time will tell, 1st Missourians will have to get him elected and 2ndly, we need to remember that we must above all put our faith in God, not men. He seems better than Kieschnick by word and deed but he could be a kinder, gentler J.A.O. Preus or he could be a more right of center version of Bohlmann. We just don't know.

Peace Be With You,

Jim

My Present To Me

Greetings,

Not too long ago it was my 43rd Birthday. It was not a humdinger in any respects, went out with the Mrs for dinner, got a little cash from my folks (still blessed with health & wealth) and I boght a few 'toys' - coins & books. This one was the absolute humdinger - a facsimile edition of Luther's 1534 Bible - complete with watercolored woodcuts - WoWzA!


Creation


Elijah Taken To Heaven On Chariot Of Fire


Israelites Dancing Around The Golden Calf


Beast of Revelation Attacking Woman With 12 Stars

I got mine off of Amazon here for $89

More about the book here

I have an electronic version of it with my E-Sword Bible software. I ran of Genesis chap 1 and added the English text of Webster's KJV beneath it like an interlinear and read it over to familiarize myself with the vocabulary then sat down and read Genesis chap 1 out of that big ole Luther Bible. I was in total Lutheran-theology-junkie-Himmel!

TTFN,

Jim

Back From My Hiatus

Greetings and Salutations,

The election is over, Christmas is over, so I'm back to blogging again.

Recently on a Lutheran discussion list I am on we had a lively discussion over the Bible, coins & dating and what Caesar meant. When the dust settled we mutually agreed to bring it to an end and afterward one of the pastors said that we should arm wrestle to settle it, another said something about jousting. I promised to show some Reformation era coins with knights on horseback as a result.

As promised:













1557 Lithuania 1/2 Grosch













1516 Mansfeld 1/2 Taler













1572 Mansfeld Taler

No jousting but the Mansfeld coins have dragons below, the taler at bottom shows it being attacked with a lance.

More Reformation era coins in this post.

Peace in Christ,

Jim

Would You Sell Out For Thirty Pieces Of Silver?

Greetings,

As I thought this was interesting both as a numismatic and as a spiritual topic I copied this post from my coin blog to this one verbatim.

Peace in Christ,

Jim

Greetings,

Recently there has been a lively discussion going on at Moneta-L, a Yahoo Group for ancient coin collecting. It has been over the value of the 30 pieces of silver given for Jesus' life to Judas Iscariot by the 'Chief Priests' of the Jewish Temple. Here are the relevant passages:

Matthew 26:14 Then one of the twelve, called Judas Iscariot, went unto the chief priests, 15 And said unto them, What will ye give me, and I will deliver him unto you? And they covenanted with him for thirty pieces of silver. 16 And from that time he sought opportunity to betray him. King James Version (KJV)

and

Matthew 27:1 When the morning was come, all the chief priests and elders of the people took counsel against Jesus to put him to death: 2 And when they had bound him, they led him away, and delivered him to Pontius Pilate the governor. 3 Then Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, 4 Saying, I have sinned in that I have betrayed the innocent blood. And they said, What is that to us? see thou to that. 5 And he cast down the pieces of silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself. 6 And the chief priests took the silver pieces, and said, It is not lawful for to put them into the treasury, because it is the price of blood. 7 And they took counsel, and bought with them the potter's field, to bury strangers in. 8 Wherefore that field was called, The field of blood, unto this day. 9 Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet, saying, And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him that was valued, whom they of the children of Israel did value; 10 And gave them for the potter's field, as the Lord appointed me. King James Version (KJV)

The post started off here, you might have to be logged in as a member (free to join) to read the posts so I will copy the better posts here minus the author's names and with a few minor spelling and grammar changes:

1st Post

Thirty Pieces of Silver in Today's Terms

Dear List,

I was at my local coin store today when the owner, who knows I'm a pastor, asked me if I knew what the infamous thirty pieces of silver from Jesus' betrayal might possibly be worth in today's currency - not in numismatic value, but in real earnings. In other words, how much would thirty shekels be in 2008 dollars.

I didn't have a good answer for him so I said I'd ask.

I know this is a vague and difficult question to answer, but are there educated guesses out there?

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Re: [Moneta-L] Thirty Pieces of Silver in Today's Terms

I think we are all in agreement that a denarius/drachma was about a days pay for a skilled laborer, so 30 pieces of Silver is equal to about 120 days pay, but I believe this was based on a low standard of living - more like the 3rd world today.

A good point for value reference is in 1st century AD (outside Rome) it would have cost about 100 Denari (200 Denari in Rome) to buy a years supply of wheat, oil and wine (basics) for a family of 4.

Here are some actual rates in 1st century Rome (before Nero)

Secretary =15 Denari/month
Lecturer =12 Denari/month
Messenger = 9 Denari/month
Fortune Teller = 10 Denari/month
Legionary = 20 Denari/month
Praetorian = 60 Denari/month

Prices in Rome

A Modius (6.67 kg) of wheat cost 32 AS (Rome), in the provinces about 1/2 that and 1/4 in rural areas
Loaf of Bread = 2 AS
Sextarius (1/2 liter of table wine) = 1 - 5 AS
Sextarius of fine wine = up to 30 AS
Public Bath = 1/4 AS
1 cloth tunic = 15 Sestersi
1 donkey = 500 Sestersi
1 slave = 500 denari
1 morgan(?) of land 250 denari

Prices as posted in Pompey

1 modium rye = 3 Sestersi
1 litra (1/3 kg oil) = 1 Sestersi
1 loaf of bread (+/- 1 lb)= 1 AS
1/2 liter of table wine = 1 AS
1 pot = 1 AS
1 dish = 1 AS
1 Oil Lamp = 1 AS
1 tunic cloth = 15 Sestersi
1 bucket = 8 AS
Criminal Fine = 25 Sestersi

I believe when talking about a denarius or drachma a day we must consider that this is a society where you could buy a slave for 500 Denarius so labor wages had to be competitive with slave labor. In Rome if it cost 200 Denarius a year just for basic food - a Denarius a day would not have been a very high standard of living.

One Roman writer (I forget who it was) says he would need 2500 denarii a year to maintain a middle class life style in Rome.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Re:Thirty Pieces of Silver in Today's Terms

On Passover night, the Jews have a long elaborate meal combined with narrative about the exodus from Egypt. At the very end, there is a song, the refrain for which is "one kid (i.e. a small goat used for the Passover sacrifice) which my father bought for two zuzim". A zuz is ~ to a denarius (in the time of Bar Kochva, ~131-135 ce) the zuzim were overstruck on Roman denarii. It's denomination is 1/4 shekel. So a shekel would buy 2 goats with a maximum age of one year old. I never bought a goat, but a 55kg (121 pound) sheep/lamb cost me in Israel ~$250 US. I think that they are cheaper in the United States.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Re:Thirty Pieces of Silver in Today's Terms

Afaik the legend tells us not what became of the proceeds, but 14oz of silver would provide Thanksgiving dinner for dozens of our destitute brethren, those said to be first in the heart of the hero betrayed.

Relating this tale of ancient coins to our own lives has been thought-provoking and fun.

Today we count blessings that can't be equaled in silver.

Happy Thanksgiving to everyone.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

The coin in question is most likely the Shekel of Tyre, I have a very corroded one in my own collection which I recieved from a British dealer who mistook it for a tetradrachm of Elagabalus for a mere £5 GBPs ($10 USD at the time) :



Here is a better one from the lifetime of Christ (4/5 A.D.) :



Here is what 30 (mixed dates) would have looked like:


Full Lot Description here.

More profound than the coins themselves, the price seems related to the cost of living in real terms. It is folly to translate the value of something like 30 tetradrachms into 2008 dollars as if we could just crank it through a currency converter or tabulate the value of silver or gold then and now. But a skilled laborer, someone like today's Nurse or Tool and Die Maker, take what they make per day, times 4, times 30 and you begin to get a handle on it. I did some of my own calculations based upon when my wife was a nurse and it came out to about a 1/2 a years wages.

Would you kill a close, faithful friend or sell your soul for 6 months of what you earn?

Jim McGarigle
Polymath Numismatics
ANA, ANS, ACCG

My Ebay Store
http://stores.ebay.com/Polymath-Numismatics-and-Etcetera

My Myspace Page
http://www.myspace.com/numismatistguy

My eBay 'ME' Page
http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/polymath_numismatics

My Coin Blog
http://awcoingeek.blogspot.com/

Happy Thanksgiving!

Enjoy a holiday favorite!

I know there is nothing 'Lutheran' about it except perhaps that Charles M. Schulz was raised Lutheran - still, enjoy!







TTFN,

Jim

It's Mourning In America

Greetings,

I know there is one significant upside to last nights election, it is that African-American / Black citizens of this country can now have the hope of breaking clean with the past, breaking the final bonds of slavery by having a sense of pride and enjoying a moment of vicarious accomplishment through the successful Presidential campaign of Barack Obama. I just feel it is coming at a high price.

No, I am not talking about Barack Obama's tax policies or spending ambitions, I am talking about the fact we have just elected the most pro-abortion candidate for President ever according to NARAL. We can expect the Freedom Of Choice Act (FOCA) to become law and for 1 to 3 Supreme Court Justices to be appointed by a President who does have a litmus test.

America is in trouble, the Word of The LORD says,

Genesis 4:10 And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto me from the ground.

Isaiah 1:15 And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide my eyes from you: yes, when ye make many prayers, I will not hear: your hands are full of blood.

Isaiah 59:2 But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear. 3 For your hands are defiled with blood, and your fingers with iniquity; your lips have spoken lies, your tongue hath muttered perverseness.

Ezekiel 23:37 They have committed adultery. Their hands are covered with blood. They commit adultery with their idols. They have sacrificed the children they gave birth to for me as burnt offerings to idols.

Roe -Vs- Wade has been the law of the land since 1973, but there has long been a sustained effort to overturn it or at least chip away at it ever since. Is the overwhelming landslide won by the Democratic Party in 2008 a rejection of that? Has our love grown cold? Have we the Church lost our zeal and conformed to the world rather than the mercy of our Saviour?

Only God knows and only time can tell.

Lord have mercy on us, Christ have mercy on us, Lord have mercy on us.

Jim

Coins And Medals Of The Reformation

Greetings and salutations,

Tis been a long time since I posted to this blog, I thought I would post some coin pics of some coins from my Reformation Era & related collection.

1504 Silver 3 Grossus Albertine Saxony

Note crossed swords forming letter 'A', this is a recurrent theme for Albertine coinage, you will see more below.

1532 Albert George AR Groschen

Kind of cool that it says, "The Just Shall Live By Faith" in Latin on the obverse around Albert's bust.

1539 AR Denar Hungary - Madonna & Child - Ferdinand I

1540 Uniface Pfennig - Salzburg

The coin has one of those funky Cardinal
hats on it near the top.

Albertine Saxony AR Hohlpfennig - Uniface 1540

Crossed swords 'A' again at left.

1543 Albert George Silver Groschen

Same as the 1532 coin above only a different style portrait.

1580 Thaler of August of Saxony

Bought it because that was the year the Book of Concord was compiled.
Crossed swords 'A' at center.

1630 Augsburg Confession Centennial Thaler - Ioannes George

The Augsburg Confession was publicly displayed for a festival and these coins were minted as circulating commemoratives. Many (like this one) were made
into medals or jewelry. This coin has an old 'mount mark' at the top of the obverse. Crossed swords forming a capital letter 'A' on both sides.

TTFN,

Jim

We Are God's Frozen Chosen - Scientifically Confirmed!

Greetings,

Lutherans have often been tagged as 'God's Frozen Chosen' because of our staid German & Scandinavian ways, our highly formalized liturgy and our slow, reverent hymns. A recent scientific study reported on Fox News' website confirms this:

— People of the Jewish faith and agnostics are 20 percent more sexually active than Christians. On the average, Protestants are less sexually active than Catholics. Presbyterians and Lutherans report less sex than Baptists.

and if that isn't bad enough -

Is your sex life a bit busier than most? If you’re a “25-year-old, high school-educated, married, Catholic jazz fan who earns $10,000 a year and who smokes and drinks regularly,” than you are probably having more sex than a college-educated, non-smoking, non-drinking Protestant.

Brings new meaning to 'cold orthodoxy' doesn't it? As a 42-year-old, college-educated, married, Lutheran who doesn't listen to jazz, makes $_ a year and rarely smokes (cigars two to four times a year) and barely drinks anymore - I plead the 5th.

Full story here

TTFN,

Jim

Nice Observation!

Thoughtful Conservative said,

My “What?” moment for the day

August 27, 2008 — thoughtfulconservative

The Journal Sentinel’s NewsWatch reports,

Joel and Victoria Osteen, pastors of the largest church in America, will hold a worship event at the Bradley Center on Sunday, Nov. 23 at 7 p.m.

“A Night of Hope” is an outreach of Joel Osteen Ministries. Also scheduled to appear are Dove Award winner Cindy Cruse Ratcliff and the Lakewood Band and Ensemble.

More than 45,000 members strong, Lakewood Church in Houston, Texas, is the largest and most diverse congregation in America. According to Nielsen Media Research, Joel Osteen is the most watched minister in America and reaches 95% of all U.S. television households.

Tickets went on sale Saturday through www.ticketmaster.com, all
Ticketmaster locations and the Bradley Center Box Office. Tickets are $17 plus applicable fees.

Tickets? $17.50? Methinks Pastor Osteen should recheck his New Testament.

------------

COMMENTARY:

Reminds me of when pop icon Bono of U2 said his God is never out of cash in response to the 1980s televangelist scandals. It also reminds me of an early Church father (Irenaeus or Ignatius?) who cautioned about false prophets who ask for money 'while in the spirit'.

Peace in Christ,

Jim

Revelation Commentary Reading Update

7 Headed Beast by Albrecht Durer

Greetings,

Maybe I feel this way because I'm not a lettered clergyman, maybe I am getting dumber as I get older but I just shoveled my way through another chapter. I always end with the Lenski commentary because it is the most challenging. I used to read it and think 'scholarly' and now I am getting to think 'pedantic'.

It would be sufficient for him to have said that a certain word or words is nominative, genitive, dative, accusative, aorist, participle, etc - but he has a tendency to use terminology like 'punctilliar aorist' and so on which is fine if you are a scholar of language but a bit heavy handed if you are not. I find I generally agree with his theological conclusions thus far but feel a bit like the soldier who is dragged over barbed wire by a comrade on his way to the field medic.

When my purse affords it, I am hoping the new Revelation commentary recently published by the LCMS bridges the gap between the People's Bible commentary with it's entry level simplicity and Lenski's with its overdetailed treatment. Lenski (IMHO) does great when he waxes more devotional and theological but gets mired in the details when he handles the Greek.

TTFN,

Jim

Reading Through Revelation - The Lutheran Way - Part 1

Greetings and salutations,

Over the last few months I have been methodically (and admittedly sporadically) reading through Revelation (also called the Apocalypse of Saint John the Divine) and unlocking it verse by verse or passage by passage depending upon the commentator.

I have employed several Bibles:

• Concordia Self Study NIV (Of Course!)
• The Lamsa Bible (an English translation of the Aramaic Peshitta)
• The King James Version
• The Webster Bible (A very respectful re-edit of the KJV that sheds archaic English words)
• A KJV/Greek Interlinear (w/Strongs NT Dictionary in the back)
• The Archaeological Study Bible NIV

I highly recommend the Archaeological Study Bible, it is the most non-denominational study Bible on the market as far as new Bibles go. Most study Bibles today are from some Reformed point of view - be it Arminian or Calvinist. This Bible is not, it sticks to the facts of archaeology but without caving in to so-called 'higher critical' thinking. Matter of fact, it does not pick any doctrinally controversial bones. Not on Baptism, the Creation, Communion, the Millennium or any pet topics of either conservative or liberal preachers. It sticks to the historical context as we know it through the archaeology of the Holy Land. Very refreshing indeed!

The commentaries have been these:

• Revelation: The People's Bible Commentary by Rev. Wayne D. Mueller
• The Revelation To John: A Commentary by Martin H. Franzmann
• Revelation: New Testament Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture edited by William C. Weinrich
  
• The interpretation of St. John's Revelation by R. C. H. Lenski
• Revelation: The last book in the Bible by Luther Poellot

I have finished Mueller's and Poellot's commentaries and found Mueller's easy to follow but not very deep. Mueller occasionally starts to rhapsodize and get off track - as if he got a little excited and began to write a sermon and then got back to the task of writing a commentary - but that is OK. It would be a good introduction for a layperson who feels overpowered by quotes in Latin, Greek or German, Mueller keeps his work down to earth. Poellot's was in depth but was a bit dry to read. Revelation is supposed to be at turns fRiGhTeNiNg and comforting and when Poellot did show any excitement in the text it was a rare surprise.

I am currently reading Franzmann, Lenski and the ACCS (Ancient Christian Commentary Series) edition which is edited by William Weinrich, a conservative Lutheran Patristics scholar. Franzmann is hard to put down. Franzmann as a hymn writer and a recognized poet writes well and while he does refer to Latin and German occasionally, he does not bog you down with it. He clearly grasps the excitement of the text while explaining the doctrinal content.

Lenski covers all bases, he gets into technical aspects of the Greek grammar and how that brings you to certain doctrinal conclusions (rather than reading Revelation through the newspaper as millenialists do!) and he also captures the historical, devotional and prophetic / apocalyptic aspects of the text. So far I like Weinrich's the best of the ones I am currently reading. He quotes and summarizes both Eastern and Western Church Fathers and commentators from the 2nd through 6th centuries.All of it is translated into English so anyone willing to take the time to read it can do so. This is a good text for a Pastor, professor or even a curious layman. It is all very straight up and non-technical and there are historical diagrams and biographical sketches of all the people quoted throughout the work.

The ACCS volume would also be enjoyed by any serious Roman Catholic or Anglican / Episcopalian - this is not a strictly Lutheran commentary at all, it was just edited by one who is a patristics scholar. The person who would not enjoy it is someone who is looking to justify a liberal or higher critical theory of interpretation or is interested in a book like this because of the fictional writings of Dan Brown, Henry Lincoln, et al. No proof for secret societies or conspiracy theories here. What you will find is a well rounded representation of the various schools of thought held by the early Church about the book of Revelation. You will also see the growth of Tradition. I have ran across quotes about the ever-virginity of Mary and how there is no salvation outside the Church, etc. The book also contains an indirect history of heresy and some fathers and commentators often read Revelation through the lens of whatever heresy the Church was facing at that moment in time.

Thats all for now.

Peace,

Jim

WELS Going Pietist?

Greetings and salutations,

Pushing the envelope of adiaphora - I have a hard time imagining the 'old German corner' of the Wisconsin Synod likes this much. I know it would probably be 'too pietist' for my own LC-MS congregation that insists on 'contemporary worship' (= smile and shake hands), but as Dick Clark would say, "It has a beat you can dance to".



What is more shocking than the style is the substance of the song. On it's face there is nothing objectionable but what few may realize is that the song was a plea for ecumenism by a pentecostal CCM artist which is certainly out of step from the WELS I knew when I was a WELS member and any unionism great or small was strictly verboten.

Later,

Jim

NIV - Satanic Bible (Another KJV Controversy!)

OK, here's one I did not see coming. I was doing some searching online, doing research about differences in Bible translations and I came across a website by some folks in the "KJV-only" movement and they asserted the NIV was a Satanic translation. OK, ok, I've heard this sort of stuff before but they further asserted that the NIV (New International Version) and the Satanic Bible were published by the same company. Now this I HAD TO SEE! Yeah, right!

Well...

So Zondervan's parent company is Harper-Collins...

Harper-Collins prints the Satanic Bible, they even say, "We'd love you to buy this book" !!!

Zondervan (Owned by Harper-Collins) also owns the copyright to the NIV

I'll allow you to draw your own conclusions but I bet that has to make some of the folks who work for Zondervan really, really happy! (NOT!)

Peace,

Jim